![]() But that solution took time to arrive at.) (I eventually solved this by creating styles with the tab stops in them, one for each page orientation. And I had to change the formatting of some kinds of documents I produced, as switching from portrait to landscape meant much more extra work as I then had to change all the tab stops on those pages too. When I had to use Word, I had to learn the tab-based workaround. If you right-justify in WordPerfect and then change your margins, paper size or paper orientation then WordPerfect just handles it for you - the text snaps to the new margin with no effort required on your part. Word has no concept of right-justification within a line unless you use tabs. Here's one practical example I found many years ago: I'd say that switching from WordPerfect to Word could well require training, especially if these kinds of differences were ones you used a lot in your work. Those are two differences off the top of my head. That's a huge difference - it's like saying that Word is a bitmap painting package, and WordPerfect is a vector one. Word has a paragraph-based formatting engine, which is very different to the stream based one in WordPerfect. Word was unwelcome as a format in many legal courts in the US, because some types of filing have word count limits and users or Word consistently over-ran, thus filing documents that the court could not accept.Ģ. Word didn't for a long time (I think they might have fixed that now). WordPerfect counts all words, even those in footnotes. Word handles word count differently to WordPerfect. Some differences between Word and WordPerfect:ġ. At this point, I feel like OOo was a dead end that had the unfortunate effect of killing off interest in competing OSS office software. I've searched systematically for something better, and haven't found it. OOo is one of the worst pieces of OSS I use. I wouldn't be surprised of #3 captured the essential truth of the situation. #Neooffice tpb windowsFor every Windows user who thinks OOo is better than MS Office, there are hundreds who hold the opposite opinion.(E.g., they don't get to choose what's on their computer at work, or they have too many documents already in Word format that they're afraid would be a huge hassle to convert 100% correctly.) For every Windows user who's willing and able to switch, there are hundreds of others who can't, because it's impractical for them.The Windows users who have never heard of OOo outnumber those who have, by hundreds to one.Some possible interpretations, none of which are pretty: That suggests that the Windows market for OOo is hundreds of times smaller than it would be based merely on the market share of the operating systems. That's a 4:1 ratio rather than the 1000:1 ratio I would have expected. It's actually pretty darn depressing that the Windows figure is as low as 80%. ![]() So based on these factors, I would have expected the percentages to be more like 99.9% Windows and 0.1% Linux, a ratio of 1000 to 1. Let's guess (pulling numbers out of my rear end, I admit) that 90% of Linux desktop users won't downloaad directly, and will get it via their distro. #Neooffice tpb downloadNot only that, but a lot of Linux users probably aren't going to download it from the OOo web site, they're going to get it when it becomes the default through their distro's packaging infrastructure, and therefore they presumably won't be counted in this statistic. I would therefore expect 99% of OOo downloads to be the Windows version. So of OOo's potential audience, I would guess 99% would be Windows users, 1% Linux users. I haven't checked recently, but for a long time, OOo's support for MacOS X lagged way, way behind. In fact, I think 80% is surprisingly low.įirst off, we really shouldn't count Macs as part of the equation. Why is 80% surprising? The article makes it sound like that's high, but Windows has more than 80% of the desktop market, so it's still a lower percentage. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |